| + | West | 
 
	  | 
A J 9 8 	 | 
  | 
A 6 3 	 | 
  | 
8 5 3 	 | 
  | 
10 5 4 	 | 
	 
	 
 
	
	
	
	 | North | 
	  | 
K Q 10 6 2 	 | 
  | 
K 10 9 2 	 | 
  | 
7 	 | 
  | 
9 8 2 	 | 
	 
	 
 
	
	
	
	| + | East | 
 
	  | 
4 	 | 
  | 
J 8 7 	 | 
  | 
A J 10 9 6 2 	 | 
  | 
Q 7 3 	 | 
	 
	 
 
	
	    		
Click the + buttons to peep
Click the + buttons to peep
  
Click the + buttons to peep
  
Click the + buttons to peep
 
    			
	Bridge Deal
from the deal bank
	You:
North	
Dealer:
South	
Vulnerability:	E-W	
	  
	
 
	
    			
	
	
	
	
			
    			
				
Click on "q1" below to see question 1, and on "A1" to see the answer.
  
	
	
	- Question 
1	
Your partner at South deals and opens 1C, so with your 8 points you reply with your longest suit, bidding 1S. The enemy are all too weak to bid, or they're asleep.  Your partner re-bids 1NT.   What should you now bid? pass, 2C, 2D, 2H, 2S, or 2NT?	
	
 
	- Question 
1	
 
Your partner at South deals and opens 1C, so with your 8 points you reply with your longest suit, bidding 1S. The enemy are all too weak to bid, or they're asleep.  Your partner re-bids 1NT.   What should you now bid? pass, 2C, 2D, 2H, 2S, or 2NT?	
	
 
Answer
 
Well, partner's got a balanced hand with 15-17 HCP, and you've got 8 HCP at North, making 23-25 in total, plus a "shape" point in Spades.   So game could be on, provided partner's not at minimum. A logical bid might be to invite to game with 2NT, but....
I just hope the singleton in diamonds is not going to be opposite a short suit in South's cards: on average she'll have 3.5 cards in this situation, let's hope it's not 2, but either way I fear there's too much exposure in diamonds for a NT contract. 
And just look at those lovely long Spades. Maybe she might have 3 of them, which is arithmetically the most likely number.  I wonder how I could tell her about them.  Do I rebid them? But then that promises 6 doesn't it? I know: if bid 2 Hearts it will describe my hand perfectly - 5 and 4 shape. 	
	
  
	- Question 
2	
Have a peep at South's hand.  What should she now rebid?  pass, 2NT, 3NT, or a suit?	
	
 
	- Question 
2	
 
Have a peep at South's hand.  What should she now rebid?  pass, 2NT, 3NT, or a suit?	
	
 
Answer
 
Well, since she's on minimum, and being a sensible duplicate player, she'll avoid higher risks. But can we leave it in Hearts?  North has only promised 4 of them, so no 8-card fit.  Seems like No Trumps is a better option than a Major game try - as we've got cover in all 4 suits.
But should we got to 2 or try for a game with 3?  Well, I'm on minimum, so let's leave it to partner to decide, since partner knows I have at least 15 HCP, but I don't know how strong she is.	
	
  
	- Question 
3	
Would the bids be different if, rather than using duplicate bridge scoring, you were playing either "teams" or rubber bridge with nothing below the line ?	
	
 
	- Question 
3	
 
Would the bids be different if, rather than using duplicate bridge scoring, you were playing either "teams" or rubber bridge with nothing below the line ?	
	
 
Answer
 
Yes, possibly.  There is a slight argument for North going straight to 3NT, given his 8 HCP plus a "shape point" in Spades.  As long as his partner South has a stopper in the terrible diamonds, then 2 out of 3 times you'll be on 25+.  And then you might get a game bonus, which scores better on riskier hands when you're not playing duplicate.  Conversely, South might be argued to be weaker than her 15 HCP implies, having a 4333 shape, which I quite like to downgrade by a point.	
	
  
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	 
				 
				
			
 
	
Other people's bidding
To examine how other people might have bid, look inside box #1 in the right-hand column (>>>), by clicking on the pink "+ button".
The card play
To see a suggested Opening Lead, look inside box #3 on the right (>>>).
Then make a plan! Think for a bit about how you'd play this contract.
Planning questions
If box #4 is there for this deal (>>>), see how others might have planned the play...